«Վիքիդարան:Խորհրդարան»–ի խմբագրումների տարբերություն
Տող 495. | Տող 495. | ||
== Մուրոյի == |
== Մուրոյի == |
||
Մենք ունենք [[Մուրոյի «զրուցը»]], [[Մուրոյի «զրույցը»]] և [[Մուրոյի «զրույց»-ը]]: Դէանք ինչ՞ով են տարբեր: - [[Մասնակից:Kareyac|Kareyac]] ([[Մասնակցի քննարկում:Kareyac|քննարկում]]) 14:28, 4 Հոկտեմբերի 2019 (UTC) |
Մենք ունենք [[Մուրոյի «զրուցը»]], [[Մուրոյի «զրույցը»]] և [[Մուրոյի «զրույց»-ը]]: Դէանք ինչ՞ով են տարբեր: - [[Մասնակից:Kareyac|Kareyac]] ([[Մասնակցի քննարկում:Kareyac|քննարկում]]) 14:28, 4 Հոկտեմբերի 2019 (UTC) |
||
:[[Մասնակից:Kareyac|Kareyac]] ջան, ներողություն եմ խնդրում ուշ արձագանքելու համար, գրառումդ չէի նկատել ։) Ըստ էության որևէ բանով չեն տարբերվում։ --[[User:GeoO|<font color = "orange"><big>Ջ</big></font><font color = "black">եօ</font>]] 09:44, 16 Հոկտեմբերի 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project == |
== Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project == |
09:44, 16 Հոկտեմբերի 2019-ի տարբերակ
- hy: Հին քննարկումները տեսնելու համար այցելեք Արխիվ
Ադմինիստրատորի իրավունքների երկարացման դիմում - GeoO
Հարգելի համայնք, վերաառաջադրում եմ ադմինի թեկնածությունս։ Շատ շնորհակալ կլինեմ, որպեսզի կարծիք հայտնեք համապատասխան էջում։ --Ջեօ 06:16, 8 Հունվարի 2018 (UTC)
ՀՍՀ 11-րդ հատորի էջերի ջնջումներ
Ողջույն, հարգելի համայնք: Մասնակից:Safi-iren կողմից կատարվել է ՀՍՀ 11-րդ հատորի մոտ գրեթե բոլոր էջերի ջնջումներ (տես այստեղ): Ձեռքով փորձեցի հետ շրջել, բայց դա հսկայական ժամանակի կորուստ է: Ով կարող է բոտով դրանք ուղղել ? --Nimeru23 (քննարկում) 07:16, 12 Մարտի 2018 (UTC)
- Հարգելի համայնք՝ մասնավորապես Nimeru23, ես իմ ակումբի բոլոր վիքիդարանները նախապես ջնջում եմ, որպեսզի երեխան սկսի սրբագրել զերոյից: Դա իմ մշակած ուսուցման ձևն է, քանի որ գտնում եմ, որ այդպես աշխատանքն ավելի որակյալ և արդյունավետ է դառնում: Խնդրեի այսուհետ իմ ակումբի կողմից խմբագրվող/սրբագրվող ցանկացած նյութի խնդրի մասին նախապես տեղեկացնել, նոր ինչ-որ գործողություններ ձեռնարկել: --Safi-iren (քննարկում) 12:24, 13 Մարտի 2018 (UTC)
- Հարգելի Safi-iren ձեր կողմից ջնջվել է ավելի քան 700 էջ նյութ, որը չեմ կարծում, որ 1-2 ժամում նորը կտեղադրվի: Մասնավորապես ինձ երեկ պետք էր նյութ Տիգրանակերտի մասին, բայց տեսնեմ, որ այն ամբողջովին ջնջված էր: Եղածը կարգի բերելը տևում է ամենաշատը մոտ 10 րոպե, իսկ 0-յից հավաքելը ահռելի ժամանակ է պահանջում: Իսկ Վիքինյութերը ջնջել ընդունված չէ: Բացի այդ ես նկատել էի, որ մի էջ հաստատված էր դրված, ձեր կողմից միայն 10 % նյութ զետեղելով, որը կատեգորիկ սխալ է: Այնպես որ կողքից նայելիս ձեր արարքը վանդալիզմ է հիշեցնում, քան կառուցողական աշխատանք: Ի դեպ, Ձեր կողմից այդ էջերը ջնջված են փետրվարի 20-ից ի վեր: --Nimeru23 (քննարկում) 12:29, 13 Մարտի 2018 (UTC)
- Հարգելի Nimeru23, իմ կողմից զետեղվում է աշխատանքի միայն 10 % քանի որ երեխայի ողջ աշխատանքի ընթացքում ես հետևում եմ նրան և արդեն իսկ գիտեմ, ինչը պետք է ստուգել, իսկ ինչը՝ ոչ: Դարանը գտնվում է Ստեփանակերտի վիքիակումբի աշխատասեղանում, հետևաբար մենք կատարում ենք մեզ հանձնարարված աշխատանքը, իսկ թե ինչպես դա արդեն ես եմ որոշում: --Safi-iren (քննարկում) 12:41, 13 Մարտի 2018 (UTC)
- Ես չգիտեմ, թե ինչ աշխատանք է կատարվում և ինչ է անում վերոնշյալ ակումբը: Որպես փորձառու մասնակից և քույր նախագծի ադմին, ասում, որ ձեր կողմից դրվել ու հեռացվել են շուրջ 700 էջ նյութ և արդեն մի 20 օր է, ինչ ոչ մի բան չի փոխվել: Չպետք է էջերը հեռացնել, այլ վրայից պետք է խմբագրել ու թարմացնել ու նոր դնել սրբագրված: --Nimeru23 (քննարկում) 12:50, 13 Մարտի 2018 (UTC)
- Հարգելի Nimeru23, իմ կողմից զետեղվում է աշխատանքի միայն 10 % քանի որ երեխայի ողջ աշխատանքի ընթացքում ես հետևում եմ նրան և արդեն իսկ գիտեմ, ինչը պետք է ստուգել, իսկ ինչը՝ ոչ: Դարանը գտնվում է Ստեփանակերտի վիքիակումբի աշխատասեղանում, հետևաբար մենք կատարում ենք մեզ հանձնարարված աշխատանքը, իսկ թե ինչպես դա արդեն ես եմ որոշում: --Safi-iren (քննարկում) 12:41, 13 Մարտի 2018 (UTC)
- Հարգելի Safi-iren ձեր կողմից ջնջվել է ավելի քան 700 էջ նյութ, որը չեմ կարծում, որ 1-2 ժամում նորը կտեղադրվի: Մասնավորապես ինձ երեկ պետք էր նյութ Տիգրանակերտի մասին, բայց տեսնեմ, որ այն ամբողջովին ջնջված էր: Եղածը կարգի բերելը տևում է ամենաշատը մոտ 10 րոպե, իսկ 0-յից հավաքելը ահռելի ժամանակ է պահանջում: Իսկ Վիքինյութերը ջնջել ընդունված չէ: Բացի այդ ես նկատել էի, որ մի էջ հաստատված էր դրված, ձեր կողմից միայն 10 % նյութ զետեղելով, որը կատեգորիկ սխալ է: Այնպես որ կողքից նայելիս ձեր արարքը վանդալիզմ է հիշեցնում, քան կառուցողական աշխատանք: Ի դեպ, Ձեր կողմից այդ էջերը ջնջված են փետրվարի 20-ից ի վեր: --Nimeru23 (քննարկում) 12:29, 13 Մարտի 2018 (UTC)
AdvancedSearch
Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:53, 7 Մայիսի 2018 (UTC)
Update on page issues on mobile web
Update on page issues on mobile web
Please help translate to your language Hi everyone. The Readers web team has recently begun working on exposing issue templates on the mobile website. Currently, details about issues with page content are generally hidden on the mobile website. This leaves readers unaware of the reliability of the pages they are reading. The goal of this project is to improve awareness of particular issues within an article on the mobile web. We will do this by changing the visual styling of page issues.
So far, we have drafted a proposal on the design and implementation of the project. We were also able to run user testing on the proposed designs. The tests so far have positive results. Here is a quick summary of what we learned:
- The new treatment increases awareness of page issues among participants. This is true particularly when they are in a more evaluative/critical mode.
- Page issues make sense to readers and they understand how they work
- Readers care about page issues and consider them important
- Readers had overwhelmingly positive sentiments towards Wikipedia associated with learning about page issues
Our next step would be to start implementing these changes. We wanted to reach out to you for any concerns, thoughts, and suggestions you might have before beginning development. Please visit the project page where we have more information and mockups of how this may look. Please leave feedback on the talk page.
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 12 Հունիսի 2018 (UTC)
Bot rights for User:Wikisource-bot
Hi. With the requirement to fix the page categorisation as notified at phab:T198470, I would like to propose to the community to have our bot run through and address the problem with the solution identified. The bot has been used to resolve issue previously on the Wikisources.
Thanks. Billinghurst (քննարկում) 09:21, 7 Հուլիսի 2018 (UTC)
Addition of hyWS to global bots
Above I have added a bot request, as this wiki is not within the global bot project, per list m:Special:WikiSets/2. Would the community consider opting in to the global bots, so that when we have Wikisource-wide fixes for mw:Extension:ProofreadPage that is possible to organise the bots to do the jobs within Phabricator, and simply get the fix in place. Billinghurst (քննարկում) 09:22, 7 Հուլիսի 2018 (UTC)
Global preferences are available
Global preferences are now available, you can set them by visiting your new global preferences page. Visit mediawiki.org for information on how to use them and leave feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
19:19, 10 Հուլիսի 2018 (UTC)
Consultation on the creation of a separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS
(Please help translate to your language)
Hi all,
I'm preparing a change in who can edit sitewide CSS/JS pages. (These are pages like MediaWiki:Common.css
and MediaWiki:Vector.js
which are executed in the browser of all readers and editors.) Currently all administrators are able to edit these pages, which poses a serious and unnecessary security risk. Soon, a dedicated, smaller user group will take over this task. Your community will be able to decide who belongs in this group, so this should mean very little change for you. You can find out more and provide feedback at the consultation page on Meta. If you are involved in maintaining CSS/JS code, or policymaking around adminship requests, please give it a look!
Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 08:45, 12 Հուլիսի 2018 (UTC) (via global message delivery)
New user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS
(Please help translate to your language)
Hi all!
To improve the security of our readers and editors, permission handling for CSS/JS pages has changed. (These are pages like MediaWiki:Common.css
and MediaWiki:Vector.js
which contain code that is executed in the browsers of users of the site.)
A new user group, interface-admin
, has been created.
Starting four weeks from now, only members of this group will be able edit CSS/JS pages that they do not own (that is, any page ending with .css
or .js
that is either in the MediaWiki:
namespace or is another user's user subpage).
You can learn more about the motivation behind the change here.
Please add users who need to edit CSS/JS to the new group (this can be done the same way new administrators are added, by stewards or local bureaucrats). This is a dangerous permission; a malicious user or a hacker taking over the account of a careless interface-admin can abuse it in far worse ways than admin permissions could be abused. Please only assign it to users who need it, who are trusted by the community, and who follow common basic password and computer security practices (use strong passwords, do not reuse passwords, use two-factor authentication if possible, do not install software of questionable origin on your machine, use antivirus software if that's a standard thing in your environment).
Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 13:08, 30 Հուլիսի 2018 (UTC) (via global message delivery)
New user group for editing sitewide CSS / JS
(Please help translate to your language)
Hi all!
To improve the security of our readers and editors, permission handling for CSS/JS pages has changed. (These are pages like MediaWiki:Common.css
and MediaWiki:Vector.js
which contain code that is executed in the browsers of users of the site.)
A new user group, interface-admin
, has been created.
Starting four weeks from now, only members of this group will be able edit CSS/JS pages that they do not own (that is, any page ending with .css
or .js
that is either in the MediaWiki:
namespace or is another user's user subpage).
You can learn more about the motivation behind the change here.
Please add users who need to edit CSS/JS to the new group (this can be done the same way new administrators are added, by stewards or local bureaucrats). This is a dangerous permission; a malicious user or a hacker taking over the account of a careless interface-admin can abuse it in far worse ways than admin permissions could be abused. Please only assign it to users who need it, who are trusted by the community, and who follow common basic password and computer security practices (use strong passwords, do not reuse passwords, use two-factor authentication if possible, do not install software of questionable origin on your machine, use antivirus software if that's a standard thing in your environment).
Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 17:44, 30 Հուլիսի 2018 (UTC) (via global message delivery)
Editing of sitewide CSS/JS is only possible for interface administrators from now
(Please help translate to your language)
Hi all,
as announced previously, permission handling for CSS/JS pages has changed: only members of the interface-admin
(Ինտերֆեյսի ադմինիստրատորներ) group, and a few highly privileged global groups such as stewards, can edit CSS/JS pages that they do not own (that is, any page ending with .css or .js that is either in the MediaWiki: namespace or is another user's user subpage). This is done to improve the security of readers and editors of Wikimedia projects. More information is available at Creation of separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS. If you encounter any unexpected problems, please contact me or file a bug.
Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 12:39, 27 Օգոստոսի 2018 (UTC) (via global message delivery)
Read-only mode for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October
Read this message in another language • Please help translate to your language
The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its secondary data centre. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
They will switch all traffic to the secondary data center on Wednesday, 12 September 2018. On Wednesday, 10 October 2018, they will switch back to the primary data center.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop when we switch. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Wednesday, 12 September and Wednesday, 10 October. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Thursday 13 September and Thursday 11 October).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the weeks of 10 September 2018 and 8 October 2018. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Johan(WMF) (talk)
13:33, 6 Սեպտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
Տեխնիկական ադմինիստրատոր
Ողջույն, հարգելի՛ խմբագիրներ։ Այսուհետ Mediawiki տարածքում խմբագրումներ կատարելու համար անհրաժեշտ է տեխնիկական ադմինիստրատորի լիազորություններ ունենալ։ Տեխնիկական հնարավորություններ ստանալու համար անհրաժեշտ է ձեր համաձայնությունը։ Խնդրում եմ ստորև հայտնել ձեր կարծիքը՝ նշելով կողմ կամ դեմ կաղապարները՝ ինձ այդ հնարավորությունները վստահել/չվստահելու համար։ Շնորհակալություն: --Ջեօ 08:10, 13 Սեպտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
- Կողմ - թեև ակտիվ չեմ նախագծում, բայց գտնում եմ, որ տեխնիկական ադմին ունենալը կարևոր է, իսկ տվյալ դեպքում GeoO մասնակիցը նաև ակտիվ ադմինիստրատոր է։--Beko (քննարկում) 07:31, 14 Սեպտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
- Կողմ, տեխնիկական ադմինը շատ կարևոր պայման է նախագծի զարգացման համար։--Lilitik22 (քննարկում) 08:40, 14 Սեպտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
- Կողմ --Emptyfear (քննարկում) 10:37, 14 Սեպտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
The GFDL license on Commons
This has been posted here because your wiki allows local file uploads. Please help translate to your language.
Commons will no longer allow uploads of photos, paintings, drawings, audio and video that use the GFDL license and no other license. This starts after 14 October. Textbooks, manuals and logos, diagrams and screenshots from GFDL software manuals that only use the GFDL license are still allowed. Files licensed with both GFDL and an accepted license like Creative Commons BY-SA are still allowed.
There is no time limit to move files from other projects to Commons. The licensing date is all that counts. It doesn't matter when the file was uploaded or created. Every wiki that allows local uploads should check if bots, scripts and templates that are used to move files to Commons need to be updated. Also update your local policy documentation if needed.
The decision to allow files that only have a GFDL license, or not allow them, is a decision all wikis can make for themselves. Your wiki can decide to continue allowing the files that Commons will no longer allow after 14 October. If your wiki decides to continue to allow files after 14 October that Commons will no longer allow those files should not be moved to Commons. — Alexis Jazz, distributed by Johan using MassMessage
18:11, 20 Սեպտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
Words hyphenated across pages in Wikisource are now joined
Hi, this is a message by Can da Lua as discussed here for wikisource communities
The ProofreadPage extension can now join together a word that is split between a page and the next.
In the past, when a page was ending with "concat-" and the next page was beginning with "enation", the resulting transclusion would have been "concat- enation", and a special template like d:Q15630535 had to be used to obtain the word "concatenation".
Now the default behavior has changed: the hyphen at the end of a page is suppressed and in this case no space is inserted, so the result of the transclusion will be: "concatenation", without the need of a template. The "joiner" character is defined by default as "-" (the regular hyphen), but it is possible to change this. A template may still be needed to deal with particular cases when the hyphen needs to be preserved.
Please share this information with your community.
MediaWiki message delivery (քննարկում) 10:28, 30 Սեպտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
The Community Wishlist Survey
The Community Wishlist Survey. Please help translate to your language.
Hey everyone,
The Community Wishlist Survey is the process when the Wikimedia communities decide what the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech should work on over the next year.
The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. You can post technical proposals from now until 11 November. The communities will vote on the proposals between 16 November and 30 November. You can read more on the wishlist survey page.
/User:Johan (WMF)11:06, 30 Հոկտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web
Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web
Please help translate to your language
Hello,
In a few weeks the Readers web team will be changing how some templates look on the mobile web site. We will make these templates more noticeable when viewing the article. We ask for your help in updating any templates that don't look correct.
What kind of templates? Specifically templates that notify readers and contributors about issues with the content of an article – the text and information in the article. Examples like Template:Unreferenced or Template:More citations needed. Right now these notifications are hidden behind a link under the title of an article. We will format templates like these (mostly those that use Template:Ambox or message box templates in general) to show a short summary under the page title. You can tap on the "Learn more" link to get more information.
For template editors we have some recommendations on how to make templates that are mobile-friendly and also further documentation on our work so far.
If you have questions about formatting templates for mobile, please leave a note on the project talk page or file a task in Phabricator and we will help you.
Շնորհակալություն
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 19:34, 13 Նոյեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
Community Wishlist Survey vote
The Community Wishlist Survey. Please help translate to your language.
Hey everyone,
The Community Wishlist Survey is the process when the Wikimedia communities decide what the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech should work on over the next year.
The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. The communities have now posted a long list of technical proposals. You can vote on the proposals from now until 30 November. You can read more on the wishlist survey page.
/User:Johan (WMF)18:13, 22 Նոյեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
Advanced Search
Johanna Strodt (WMDE) (talk) 11:02, 26 Նոյեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
Selection of the Wikisource Community User Group representative to the Wikimedia Summit
Dear all,
Sorry for writing in English and cross-posting this message.
The Wikisource Community User Group could send one representative to the Wikimedia Summit 2019 (formerly "Wikimedia Conference"). The Wikimedia Summit is a yearly conference of all organizations affiliated to the Wikimedia Movement (including our Wikisource Community User Group). It is a great place to talk about Wikisource needs to the chapters and other user groups that compose the Wikimedia movement. For context, there is a short report on what happened last year. The deadline is short and to avoid the confusing vote on the Wikisource-I mailing list of last year, we created a page on meta to decide who will be the representative of the user group to the Wikimedia Summit.
The vote will be in two parts:
- until December 7th, people can add their name and a short explanation on who they are and why they want to go to the summit. Nomination of other people is allowed, the nominated person should accept their nomination.
- starting December 7th, and for a week, the community vote to designate the representative.
Please feel free to ask any question on the wikisource-I mailing list or on the talk page.
For the Wikisource Community User Group, Tpt (talk) 15:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
New Wikimedia password policy and requirements
Please help translate to your language
The Wikimedia Foundation security team is implementing a new password policy and requirements. You can learn more about the project on MediaWiki.org.
These new requirements will apply to new accounts and privileged accounts. New accounts will be required to create a password with a minimum length of 8 characters. Privileged accounts will be prompted to update their password to one that is at least 10 characters in length.
These changes are planned to be in effect on December 13th. If you think your work or tools will be affected by this change, please let us know on the talk page.
Շնորհակալություն
CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:03, 6 Դեկտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
Wikisource Community User Group representative vote
Dear all,
Sorry for writing in English and cross-posting this message.
Following the previous message, the vote for the representative of the Wikisource Community User Group to the Wikimedia Summit 2019 is now open.
There is two great candidates on page on meta to decide who will be the representative of the user group to the Wikimedia Summit. You can support a candidate now. All active Wikisource users can vote. The vote is ending on December 14, 2018.
Feel free to ask any question on the wikisource-I mailing list or on the talk page.
Շնորհակալություն
For the Wikisource Community User Group, Tpt (talk) December 8, 2018 at 18:53 (UTC)
Invitation from Wiki Loves Love 2019
Please help translate to your language
Love is an important subject for humanity and it is expressed in different cultures and regions in different ways across the world through different gestures, ceremonies, festivals and to document expression of this rich and beautiful emotion, we need your help so we can share and spread the depth of cultures that each region has, the best of how people of that region, celebrate love.
Wiki Loves Love (WLL) is an international photography competition of Wikimedia Commons with the subject love testimonials happening in the month of February.
The primary goal of the competition is to document love testimonials through human cultural diversity such as monuments, ceremonies, snapshot of tender gesture, and miscellaneous objects used as symbol of love; to illustrate articles in the worldwide free encyclopedia Wikipedia, and other Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) projects.
The theme of 2019 iteration is Celebrations, Festivals, Ceremonies and rituals of love.
Sign up your affiliate or individually at Participants page.
To know more about the contest, check out our Commons Page and FAQs
There are several prizes to grab. Hope to see you spreading love this February with Wiki Loves Love!
Kind regards,
Imagine... the sum of all love!
--MediaWiki message delivery (քննարկում) 10:12, 27 Դեկտեմբերի 2018 (UTC)
FileExporter beta feature
A new beta feature will soon be released on all wikis: The FileExporter. It allows exports of files from a local wiki to Wikimedia Commons, including their file history and page history. Which files can be exported is defined by each wiki's community: Please check your wiki's configuration file if you want to use this feature.
The FileExporter has already been a beta feature on mediawiki.org, meta.wikimedia, deWP, faWP, arWP, koWP and on wikisource.org. After some functionality was added, it's now becoming a beta feature on all wikis. Deployment is planned for January 16. More information can be found on the project page.
As always, feedback is highly appreciated. If you want to test the FileExporter, please activate it in your user preferences. The best place for feedback is the central talk page. Thank you from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes project.
Johanna Strodt (WMDE) 09:41, 14 Հունվարի 2019 (UTC)
No editing for 30 minutes on 17 January
18:40, 16 Հունվարի 2019 (UTC)
Ադմինիստրատորի իրավունքների երկարացման դիմում - GeoO-4
Հարգելի համայնք, վերաառաջադրում եմ ադմինի թեկնածությունս։ Շատ շնորհակալ կլինեմ, որպեսզի կարծիք հայտնեք համապատասխան էջում։ --Ջեօ 06:16, 8 Հունվարի 2018 (UTC)
Talk to us about talking
The Wikimedia Foundation is planning a global consultation about communication. The goal is to bring Wikimedians and wiki-minded people together to improve tools for communication.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis, whatever their experience, their skills or their devices.
We are looking for input from as many different parts of the Wikimedia community as possible. It will come from multiple projects, in multiple languages, and with multiple perspectives.
We are currently planning the consultation. We need your help.
We need volunteers to help talk to their communities or user groups.
You can help by hosting a discussion at your wiki. Here's what to do:
- First, sign up your group here.
- Next, create a page (or a section on a Village pump, or an e-mail thread – whatever is natural for your group) to collect information from other people in your group. This is not a vote or decision-making discussion: we are just collecting feedback.
- Then ask people what they think about communication processes. We want to hear stories and other information about how people communicate with each other on and off wiki. Please consider asking these five questions:
- When you want to discuss a topic with your community, what tools work for you, and what problems block you?
- What about talk pages works for newcomers, and what blocks them?
- What do others struggle with in your community about talk pages?
- What do you wish you could do on talk pages, but can't due to the technical limitations?
- What are the important aspects of a "wiki discussion"?
- Finally, please go to Talk pages consultation 2019 on Mediawiki.org and report what you learned from your group. Please include links if the discussion is available to the public.
You can also help build the list of the many different ways people talk to each other.
Not all groups active on wikis or around wikis use the same way to discuss things: it can happen on wiki, on social networks, through external tools... Tell us how your group communicates.
You can read more about the overall process on mediawiki.org. If you have questions or ideas, you can leave feedback about the consultation process in the language you prefer.
Thank you! We're looking forward to talking with you.
Trizek (WMF) 15:01, 21 Փետրվարի 2019 (UTC)
IMPORTANT: Admin activity review
- Apologies for using English, we have no հայերեն translation of this message.
Hello,
A policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc. ) was adopted by global community consensus in 2013. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis with no inactivity policy. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the admin activity review.
We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):
These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.
However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki.
Thanks,
--MarcoAurelio (քննարկում) 11:13, 7 Մարտի 2019 (UTC)
- Today I removed admin status. Einsbor (քննարկում) 09:44, 12 Ապրիլի 2019 (UTC)
Read-only mode for up to 30 minutes on 11 April
10:56, 8 Ապրիլի 2019 (UTC)
Wikimedia Foundation Medium-Term Plan feedback request
Please help translate to your language
Ինտերֆեյսի ադմինիստրատոր - GeoO
Հարգելի՛ խմբագիրներ, որոշ բացակայող սկրիպտներ պատրաստելու համար (օրինակ՝ MediaWiki:PageNumbers.js-ը) ինտերֆեյսի ադմինության դրոշակ է պետք։ Ցանկանում եմ տեղեկացնել, որ դիմելու եմ ինտերֆեյսի ադմինի կարգավիճակ ստանալու համար։ --Ջեօ 08:43, 9 Հունիսի 2019 (UTC)
Update on the consultation about office actions
Hello all,
Last month, the Wikimedia Foundation's Trust & Safety team announced a future consultation about partial and/or temporary office actions. We want to let you know that the draft version of this consultation has now been posted on Meta.
This is a draft. It is not intended to be the consultation itself, which will be posted on Meta likely in early September. Please do not treat this draft as a consultation. Instead, we ask your assistance in forming the final language for the consultation.
For that end, we would like your input over the next couple of weeks about what questions the consultation should ask about partial and temporary Foundation office action bans and how it should be formatted. Please post it on the draft talk page. Our goal is to provide space for the community to discuss all the aspects of these office actions that need to be discussed, and we want to ensure with your feedback that the consultation is presented in the best way to encourage frank and constructive conversation.
Please visit the consultation draft on Meta-wiki and leave your comments on the draft’s talk page about what the consultation should look like and what questions it should ask.
Thank you for your input! -- The Trust & Safety team 08:03, 16 Օգոստոսի 2019 (UTC)
New tools and IP masking
Hey everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation wants to work on two things that affect how we patrol changes and handle vandalism and harassment. We want to make the tools that are used to handle bad edits better. We also want to get better privacy for unregistered users so their IP addresses are no longer shown to everyone in the world. We would not hide IP addresses until we have better tools for patrolling.
We have an idea of what tools could be working better and how a more limited access to IP addresses would change things, but we need to hear from more wikis. You can read more about the project on Meta and post comments and feedback. Now is when we need to hear from you to be able to give you better tools to handle vandalism, spam and harassment.
You can post in your language if you can't write in English.
Johan (WMF)14:19, 21 Օգոստոսի 2019 (UTC)
Wikisource:News (en): September 2019 Edition
Current · Archives · Discussion · Subscribe –MJL ⁓T-k’nnarkum⁓☖ 23:25, 1 Սեպտեմբերի 2019 (UTC)
The consultation on partial and temporary Foundation bans just started
Hello,
In a recent statement, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees requested that staff hold a consultation to "re-evaluat[e] or add community input to the two new office action policy tools (temporary and partial Foundation bans)".
Accordingly, the Foundation's Trust & Safety team invites all Wikimedians to join this consultation and give their feedback from 30 September to 30 October.
How can you help?
- Suggest how partial and temporary Foundation bans should be used, if they should (eg: On all projects, or only on a subset);
- Give ideas about how partial and temporary Foundation bans should ideally implemented, if they should be; and/or
- Propose changes to the existing Office Actions policy on partial and temporary bans.
We offer our thanks in advance for your contributions, and we hope to get as much input as possible from community members during this consultation!
Մուրոյի
Մենք ունենք Մուրոյի «զրուցը», Մուրոյի «զրույցը» և Մուրոյի «զրույց»-ը: Դէանք ինչ՞ով են տարբեր: - Kareyac (քննարկում) 14:28, 4 Հոկտեմբերի 2019 (UTC)
- Kareyac ջան, ներողություն եմ խնդրում ուշ արձագանքելու համար, գրառումդ չէի նկատել ։) Ըստ էության որևէ բանով չեն տարբերվում։ --Ջեօ 09:44, 16 Հոկտեմբերի 2019 (UTC)
Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project
Please help translate to your language
Ողջո՜ւյն. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.
We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.
We would like individual feedback on the following:
- Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
- Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
- Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far
We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.
When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:
- Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
- Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
- Put things in logical and useful places
- Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
- Eliminate clutter
- Plan for future growth
As well as the following constraints:
- Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
- Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
- No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors
Please give all feedback (in any language) at mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements
After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.
Շնորհակալություն Quiddity (WMF) (talk)